I pray that child pornographers have a special super hot, blow torch on the tenders section in Hell. They are bottom feeders. No, they are below bottom feeders. They are what bottom feeders feed on.
Which is why federal “judges” like Jack B. Weinstein create a spastic involuntary head shaking of disbelief. How can anyone think this:
In his 43-year career as a federal judge, Jack B. Weinstein has come to be identified by his efforts to combat what he calls “the unnecessary cruelty of the law.” His most recent crusade is particularly striking because of the beneficiary: a man who has amassed a vast collection of child pornography.
Judge Jack B. Weinstein in his chambers in the United States District Courthouse in Brooklyn in April.
Judge Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed “no risk to society.”
HE’S A FREAKING CHILD PORNOGRAPHER, YOU MOUNTAIN OF DUMBASSNESS!
If he is anything, he’s a risk to society.
I wish I could say that was the worst of it, but no, there’s more:
Judge Weinstein has gone to extraordinary lengths to challenge the strict punishments, issuing a series of rulings that directly attack the mandatory five-year prison sentence faced by defendants charged with receiving child pornography.
“I don’t approve of child pornography, obviously,” he said in an interview this week. But, he also said, he does not believe that those who view the images, as opposed to producing or selling them, present a threat to children.
“We’re destroying lives unnecessarily,” he said. “At the most, they should be receiving treatment and supervision.”
He’s an advocate of lessening the punishment for owning child pornography and thinks the current law prosecuting these sub human pieces of rat waste are the ones who are having their lives destroyed? Are you for real?
And how can the consumers of child porn not be a threat to children? At the most basic level, they create a threat to children by their demand for the child pornographer’s product. And the desire to view such material shows a desire to participate in such acts. It’s only a matter of time before visual stimulation doesn’t cut it, and then the predator goes hunting.
This goes back to an article I wrote a few years ago. I put it in the sidebar. It’s called “The Shadow Sexual Revolution: The Push to Legalize Pedophilia.” It’s morons like this who think pedophiles, child pornographers and the scavengers who eat up their filth aren’t threats, but just people who need help.
They don’t need help. They need a hole under the prison where they can rot.
Hat Tip: Scared Monkeys
