The United Nations’ top climate talking head said recently:
ignoring the urgency of global warming would be “criminally irresponsible.”
He was talking to “policymakers and scientists trying to hammer out a landmark report on climate change.”
Crinimally irresponsible? I don’t think so. How about ignoring all the data that shows that global warming is natural, that the Earth might just be getting back to normal? How about using graphs that are outright lies, and then selling the “science” to the world as fact.
Then there is this report from a little group I like to call NASA:
A team of NASA and university scientists has detected an ongoing reversal in Arctic Ocean circulation triggered by atmospheric circulation changes that vary on decade-long time scales. The results suggest not all the large changes seen in Arctic climate in recent years are a result of long-term trends associated with global warming.
Is it criminal to ignore this?
How about ignoring the farms on Greenland, or the silver mines that were covered by glaciers? Is that criminal too? it seems that it is only criminal if you speak against the Church. Or should I say it’s heresy.
