banning Babies to Fight Global Warming

By Duane Lester • Nov 15th, 2007

How can Britains do more to fight the ever increasing threat of global warming? Stop procreating:

Chris Davies has warned that halting population growth, as an answer to global warming, would prove to be far more efficient than trying to cut pollution.

The North West England MEP added that families should be encouraged to have no more than one child in an effort to combat climate change.

But he said he did not support “Chinese-like ideas of compulsion”.

“What’s the single most effective thing couples can do to play a part in combating global warming? It is to have no more than one child,” the Mirror quoted him, as saying.

I imagine what will be proposed is that you can have one child, but any others will have to be “purchased” with carbon credits or carbon offsets, or maybe you have to plant a forest for each extra child. Can you see that this isn’t about saving the world from global warming, but about asserting more control over the masses? The disciples are trying to dictate how many children you can have in order to stop global warming.

They will continue to try to control your behavior in the name of “settled science” until you have to get a government chit to burp.

Sphere: Related Content

Duane Lester is an ex-Navy journalist turned blogger and podcaster. He is the lead writer and editor for All American Blogger. You can also find him on StumbleUpon, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Blog Talk Radio and Newsvine. You can contact him by clicking the "E-mail this Author" button below.
Email this author | All posts by Duane Lester | Subscribe to this author's RSS Feed