social: Email This

Palin-Keene Feud Continues, Palin to Skip CPAC Again

Why would Sarah Palin, or her people, think skipping CPAC would be advisable?  Palin’s people say it’s because the ACU was involved in a pay for play scandal:

Palin is declining an invitation to address the Conservative Political Action Conference next month because, a source said, she does not want to be affiliated with the longtime organizer of the traditional movement confab.

At issue is the role of David Keene, head of the American Conservative Union which organizes CPAC. In September, POLITICO reported that Keene asked FedEx for between $2 million and $3 million to get the group’s support in a bitter legislative battle with rival UPS.

A source close to the Palin camp says that request led to a decision to stay away from the upcoming CPAC conference, calling it a forum that will place “special interests over core beliefs” and “pocketbook over policy.”

“That’s not what CPAC should be about and people are tiring,” the source said. “Palin is taking a stance against this just as she did in Alaska.”

Gov. Sarah Palin has breakfast and visits with...That’s a nice position to take, but it’s hard for me to swallow.

First, let’s discuss the whole FedEx/UPS issues involving Keene.

Here’s what Politico said happened:

The American Conservative Union asked FedEx for a check for $2 million to $3 million in return for the group’s endorsement in a bitter legislative dispute, then flipped and sided with UPS after FedEx refused to pay.

For the $2 million+, ACU offered a range of services that included: “Producing op-eds and articles written by ACU’s Chairman David Keene and / or other members of the ACU’s board of directors. (Note that Mr. Keene writes a weekly column that appears in The Hill.)”

The conservative group’s remarkable demand — black-and-white proof of the longtime Washington practice known as “pay for play” — was contained in a private letter to FedEx that was provided to POLITICO. …

In the three-page letter asking for money on June 30, the conservative group backed FedEx. Rebuffed, the group signed onto a two-page July 15 letter backing UPS.

Erick Erickson at Red State breaks down Keene’s side:

According to Mr. Keene, the correspondence with FedEx was written June 30th and he agreed to lend his name to the other letter on July 1st. The letter was dated July 15th. He says he is sure that he had signed off on the second letter before FedEx even had time to make a decision on ACU’s letter.

His point, above all else, was that he had no knowledge of the ACU letter. People, myself included, forget that Dave Keene, unlike many other leaders of conservative interest groups, is not a full time Chairman. He is not in charge of the day to day operations of ACU and did not participate in the negotiations with FedEx.

What Keene does say, however, is that the conversation with FedEx was ongoing. ACU told FedEx that it supported its position. FedEx asked ACU what it could do to mobilize grassroots opposition. ACU told FedEx it could help, but did not have the budget for an aggressive campaign. FedEx asked ACU for a ballpark figure. ACU asked FedEx what it was looking for. FedEx said to make it a kitchen sink proposal and throw in everything.

The June 30, 2009, letter was a product of those ongoing conversations.

The money was to help organize the grassroots for a position the ACU supported, but didn’t have the money to promote the way FedEx wanted.  And Keene later released a statement on this story supporting FedEx:

Let me be clear on this. I continue to agree with Senator Wallop’s objection to the mischaracterization of the issue and I also I continue to oppose extending NLRB jurisdiction to FedEx. Neither I nor ACU has changed our position on this and won’t, though I must admit that I am less than impressed with the manner in which FedEx has treated me and ACU in this matter.

Maybe I’m being a bit naive, but it sounds like a bit of a misunderstanding.  Perhaps Palin’s people didn’t get the whole story.

Or perhaps they are still bitter about what Keene said in July to Newsmax:

Sarah Palin needs to stop whining about unfair media coverage and get over the fact that some people don’t like her, Dave Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union, tells Newsmax.

Palin doesn’t seem to get that politics is a tough game, says Keene, one of the country’s most astute political observers.

The American Conservative Union, with 1 million members, runs the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington and publishes an annual “Rating of Congress,” the gold standard for ideological assessments of members of Congress.

“You’ve got to recognize that there are people who want you to fail,” Keene says. “And if you spend your time worrying about them, or whining about what they say, at the very least it’ll get you off your game, because you ought to be worried about what you’re going to do, not about what they’re going to do to you.”

Resigning as governor of Alaska only compounded Palin’s problems, which have been accumulating since the November election, Keene says.

“In the period leading up to the resignation, she needed to get over the fact that people didn’t like her,” Keene says. “Get over the fact that she harbored resentment for the McCain people that used her. All of those things are true, but she got more out of it than they did, and she had to begin to move on with what she needed to establish in terms of her own image, to move to the next level. And she delayed doing that.

“Now it becomes more difficult because of the way in which she bailed out on the governorship.”

I think it’s more likely this has more to do with her decision than the FedEx/UPS brouhaha.  But I would not have let it keep me from attending the largest gathering of conservatives in the country.

In fact, the bolder move would be to attend and in her speech address these things.  That would have been worth the price of admission.

Sarah will be attending the the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in April in New Orleans.  She’ll have a large audience there as well.

It’s just disappointing that she can’t be at CPAC as well.  The event is bigger than David Keene.  I didn’t see him there, aside from when he was speaking on stage.  For me, and so many others, the real CPAC is in the displays and discussions that take place away from the auditoriums.

You know, out with the people…the grassroots.

Update:

Dan Riehl weighs in:

image As for Palin, I believe her recent decision-making is doing considerable disservice to the Conservative movement. Whether she’s too thin-skinned to accept that Keene didn’t bow down and worship her, or sees him as a threat as a potential Romney supporter and wants him out, I don’t know. The other possiblity is that she’s buying into Palin sycophant John Ziegler’s take on Keene. That would not be a balanced, truly informed approach and would look self-serving at best.

What I do know is that she will be cashing a check from a Tea Party group that does not speak for the whole, potentially giving it more weight than it deserves because they are either fans, or want to cash some checks themselves. The notion that she is cashing a check while also now going out of her way to run down CPAC, a group that despite its faults, does good service for theConservative movement, leaves me less than thrilled with her actions.

I imagine many hoping to attend CPAC this year can’t afford a grand, or two to go to Nashville to hear the queen speak. And for all it’s clout in the South, the Southern Republican Leadership Congress she’ll address is not a national event. Neither is the Nashville convention, I suspect. But she didn’t allow that to get in the way of her cashing a check. I doubt she truly understands the nature of the genuine Tea Party movement very well at all.

I’ve been to the tea parties in my area. I can’t continue to support a movement that could end up strengthening what the movement is supposed to be against. I’m starting to get mad. I’m starting to believe that the Tea Party movement has been taken over by opportunists.

Unfortunately, and as all too often happens in politics, it’s a pox on all their houses in my opinion just now. If something changes to alter my current opinion, I’ll say so. Until then, I’m moving on from this now unfortunate mess mainly courtesy of Palin, if you ask me.

No more whining about press hit jobs, Sarah. You’ve now proved yourself rather capable of orchestrating the very same thing. Maybe Hillyer is right and getting over yourself wouldn’t be such a bad idea. I’ve no intention of making the mistake the Left made by becoming so entranced with a shooting star my eyes glaze over. They forgot stars don’t burn forever and don’t stay aloft very long, either. The Right cannot afford to make the same mistake.

Other bloggers talking about this:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
share: Email This
Subscribe to the All American Blogger RSS feed.
[67]
  • Rhubarb

    I hope Palin moves back into the “fold”, but if not we will continue to move forward. She was a great asset to Conservatives/Libertarians but maybe wasn’t constituted correctly for the rough and tumble of politics. She would make a great candidate for a third party. I realize many are against the idea of a third party as most of its new members would canabalize the GOP. We need, however, to put the past behind us, and recognize the fact that Republicans have bellied up to the old public trough as often as Dems.

  • Rhubarb

    I hope Palin moves back into the “fold”, but if not we will continue to move forward. She was a great asset to Conservatives/Libertarians but maybe wasn’t constituted correctly for the rough and tumble of politics. She would make a great candidate for a third party. I realize many are against the idea of a third party as most of its new members would canabalize the GOP. We need, however, to put the past behind us, and recognize the fact that Republicans have bellied up to the old public trough as often as Dems.

  • http://www.rfcradio.com Andrew Riley

    The old party way of doing things has pretty much screwed us. I support Palin’s break from the old way and think she’s brave for not being sucked into the GOP muck. CPAC will be fine without her and she’ll be fine without CPAC. The fact that she’s not going is news, so she’s in no way irrelevant.

  • http://www.rfcradio.com Andrew Riley

    The old party way of doing things has pretty much screwed us. I support Palin’s break from the old way and think she’s brave for not being sucked into the GOP muck. CPAC will be fine without her and she’ll be fine without CPAC. The fact that she’s not going is news, so she’s in no way irrelevant.

  • http://www.allamericanblogger.com Duane Lester

    Reagan said we didn’t need a third party, but a revitalized Republican Party. I agree with him. The only way to get the GOP back in line is to make them feel pain.

    Stop donating to official GOP organizations and only donate to candidates you support. Too often, the GOP and their sister organizations support the candidate they think will win, not the one who is most conservative.

    Dede Scozzafava comes to mind.

    This is the route to take. The third party route leads to a dominate Democrat Party.
    .-= Duane Lester´s last blog ..Palin-Keene Feud Continues, Palin to Skip CPAC Again =-.

  • http://www.allamericanblogger.com Duane Lester

    Reagan said we didn’t need a third party, but a revitalized Republican Party. I agree with him. The only way to get the GOP back in line is to make them feel pain.

    Stop donating to official GOP organizations and only donate to candidates you support. Too often, the GOP and their sister organizations support the candidate they think will win, not the one who is most conservative.

    Dede Scozzafava comes to mind.

    This is the route to take. The third party route leads to a dominate Democrat Party.
    .-= Duane Lester´s last blog ..Palin-Keene Feud Continues, Palin to Skip CPAC Again =-.

  • Tennessean1942

    No serious CONSERVATIVE candidate would attend CPAC.

    3 short videos to tell you why:

    http://tinyurl.com/yd7djtk

  • Tennessean1942

    No serious CONSERVATIVE candidate would attend CPAC.

    3 short videos to tell you why:

    http://tinyurl.com/yd7djtk

  • http://thedesignconservative.com Camille

    Thanks for your thoughts on the Palin-CPAC situation. I tend to believe that Governor Palin knows what she’s doing in instances like this. So far, she’s been pretty right on with making decisions that end up being the right ones in the long run.

    That said, you are correct in saying that CPAC’s real value goes way beyond Mr. Keene. It is about engaging with fellow attendees, hearing from a variety of speakers (whom one may or may not agree with), and staying in tune with what is happening in the Conservative movement. Whether Governor Palin is there or not, I would say that the conference has value for those reasons.
    .-= Camille´s last blog ..sarah palin and cpac 2010: what’s the deal? =-.

  • http://thedesignconservative.com Camille

    Thanks for your thoughts on the Palin-CPAC situation. I tend to believe that Governor Palin knows what she’s doing in instances like this. So far, she’s been pretty right on with making decisions that end up being the right ones in the long run.

    That said, you are correct in saying that CPAC’s real value goes way beyond Mr. Keene. It is about engaging with fellow attendees, hearing from a variety of speakers (whom one may or may not agree with), and staying in tune with what is happening in the Conservative movement. Whether Governor Palin is there or not, I would say that the conference has value for those reasons.
    .-= Camille´s last blog ..sarah palin and cpac 2010: what’s the deal? =-.

  • GRIM

    I think a serious CONSERVATIVE candidate would attend, but more for the fore-mentioned “engaging with fellow attendees”, that could be future constituents. Thanks for the link to those videos, they irritated me, and made me laugh at Mr. Keene’s immaturity. I don’t think they should go for any reason other than hearing what the people want from their politiicans.

    I watched some interesting videos earlier titled “Why do 91% of African Americans support Obama” or something very close to that. After saying “Obama’s doing a good job” the man being interviewed shared more viewpoints with Obama’s opponents in Washington than Obama, himself. If we want to get our country back, we need to have politicians that know what we’re looking for when we send them, conservatives/libertarians/moderates taking back jobs that are currently held by liberals/progressives (teachers, professors, lawyers, scientists). I think it all starts with clear communication and transparency. Those videos show at the least, that Keene isn’t a favor of either. IMO, he shouldn’t be leading any Conservative organization if he isn’t.

  • GRIM

    I think a serious CONSERVATIVE candidate would attend, but more for the fore-mentioned “engaging with fellow attendees”, that could be future constituents. Thanks for the link to those videos, they irritated me, and made me laugh at Mr. Keene’s immaturity. I don’t think they should go for any reason other than hearing what the people want from their politiicans.

    I watched some interesting videos earlier titled “Why do 91% of African Americans support Obama” or something very close to that. After saying “Obama’s doing a good job” the man being interviewed shared more viewpoints with Obama’s opponents in Washington than Obama, himself. If we want to get our country back, we need to have politicians that know what we’re looking for when we send them, conservatives/libertarians/moderates taking back jobs that are currently held by liberals/progressives (teachers, professors, lawyers, scientists). I think it all starts with clear communication and transparency. Those videos show at the least, that Keene isn’t a favor of either. IMO, he shouldn’t be leading any Conservative organization if he isn’t.

  • http://ubsn.net Unkle Bonehead

    I commend Palin on not going. It gives reinforcement to here core beliefs and the fact that she sticks to them. Something most candidates wont do nowadays. And that is what confuses me everyone is acting and talking like she is a candidate. What if she isnt? Perhaps she just wants to use her leverage for someone else and feels that by going to CPAC she will damage that leverage?
    If we are to take back the Republican party compromising an individuals beliefs to please a few will do nothing for the big picture.
    2010 and 2012 will be won by the candidate who the public perceives to be the most genuine, trustworthy, intelligent and honest person. So far Palin is the one who fits that bill…
    .-= Unkle Bonehead´s last blog ..Show time and day has moved =-.

  • http://ubsn.net Unkle Bonehead

    I commend Palin on not going. It gives reinforcement to here core beliefs and the fact that she sticks to them. Something most candidates wont do nowadays. And that is what confuses me everyone is acting and talking like she is a candidate. What if she isnt? Perhaps she just wants to use her leverage for someone else and feels that by going to CPAC she will damage that leverage?
    If we are to take back the Republican party compromising an individuals beliefs to please a few will do nothing for the big picture.
    2010 and 2012 will be won by the candidate who the public perceives to be the most genuine, trustworthy, intelligent and honest person. So far Palin is the one who fits that bill…
    .-= Unkle Bonehead´s last blog ..Show time and day has moved =-.