http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/ Stopping America's March Across the Bridge to Dependence Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:07:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1079 BowlMeOverVa (BowlMeOverVa) Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:01:22 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1079 Ten Years for Oil? Bad. Ten Years for Nuke Plants? Sounds Good. - http://tinyurl.com/yb88pfd #tcot #sgp #tlot Ten Years for Oil? Bad. Ten Years for Nuke Plants? Sounds Good. – http://tinyurl.com/yb88pfd #tcot #sgp #tlot

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4833 BowlMeOverVa (BowlMeOverVa) Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:01:00 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4833 Ten Years for Oil? Bad. Ten Years for Nuke Plants? Sounds Good. - http://tinyurl.com/yb88pfd #tcot #sgp #tlot Ten Years for Oil? Bad. Ten Years for Nuke Plants? Sounds Good. – http://tinyurl.com/yb88pfd #tcot #sgp #tlot

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1078 bmo Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:01:03 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1078 Oh and who make the reactors? Let me guess, GE? Oh and who make the reactors? Let me guess, GE?

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4832 bmo Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4832 Oh and who make the reactors? Let me guess, GE? Oh and who make the reactors? Let me guess, GE?

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1077 bmo Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:58:11 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1077 I read the board regulating the Nuc plants is made up of five appointees, of which only three have been appointed (and one of them is leaving). No new replacements have been identified for the other two vacant slots. So I don't expect much in the way of "fast" tracking any new plants or progress in this field in the near future. I read the board regulating the Nuc plants is made up of five appointees, of which only three have been appointed (and one of them is leaving). No new replacements have been identified for the other two vacant slots. So I don’t expect much in the way of “fast” tracking any new plants or progress in this field in the near future.

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4831 bmo Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:58:00 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4831 I read the board regulating the Nuc plants is made up of five appointees, of which only three have been appointed (and one of them is leaving). No new replacements have been identified for the other two vacant slots. So I don't expect much in the way of "fast" tracking any new plants or progress in this field in the near future. I read the board regulating the Nuc plants is made up of five appointees, of which only three have been appointed (and one of them is leaving). No new replacements have been identified for the other two vacant slots. So I don’t expect much in the way of “fast” tracking any new plants or progress in this field in the near future.

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1076 Mr. Xyz Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:00:13 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-1076 This spoof of climate science may be of interest: <a href="http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960" rel="nofollow"> http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960 </a> This spoof of climate science may be of interest:

http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960

]]> http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4830 Mr. Xyz Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:00:00 +0000 http://www.allamericanblogger.com/9727/ten-years-for-oil-bad-ten-years-for-nuke-plants-sounds-good/#comment-4830 This spoof of climate science may be of interest: <a href="http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960" rel="nofollow"> http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960 </a> This spoof of climate science may be of interest:

http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960

]]>