I saw this over at Hot Air, and as I watched it, I could believe how quickly Soledad O’Brien started attacking Joel Pollack and defending Barack Obama and racialist Derek Bell.

It’s a stunning display of how overt the media has become in its support of Obama:

What a disgusting display of journalistic malpractice. The only member of that entire panel with a shred of integrity is Amy Holmes, who had the spine to question why we didn’t see this in 2008.

The rest started minimizing the radicalism of Bell, defending the president, and attacking Joel.

This is why the alternative media is so important. The main stream media has forgotten what it is here for.

Two radical Democrat Congresswomen were confronted by freelance journalist Ed Frank and asked to comment on Bill Maher’s referral to Sarah Palin as a “cunt” and a “dumb twat.” Considering both women wasted no time releasing statements about Rush Limbaugh’s comment on Sandra Fluke, you would think they would be equally outraged at Maher’s offensive comments.

You would think…

Their silence is deafening, but it goes back to one point every protected class needs to recognize. You are important to a Democrat when you are useful in promoting the agenda. If you don’t, you’re dead to them.

As promised by Andrew Breitbart at CPAC, here is video of President Barack Obama during his college years, protesting for and embracing racialist, radical college professor Derrick Bell.

The PJ Tatler has some “fun facts” about Professor Bell:

Bell was credited with developing “critical race theory,” which suggested that the U.S. legal system was inherently biased against African Americans and other minorities because it was built on an ingrained white point of view. He argued in his many books and lectures that the life experiences of black people and other minorities should be considered in hiring decisions and in applying the law.

Bell maintained that the standards for promotion and tenure at law schools – and Harvard, in particular – were inherently discriminatory and excluded a broad group of minorities. By hiring only graduates of top-tier law schools who had clerked at the Supreme Court, he argued, academia was populated by a uniform group of standard-issue professors, most of them white men.

And why are we not surprised that he was a Farrakhan supporter?

Some scholars, both black and white, challenged Bell’s ideas, as well as his strong support of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Nonetheless, Bell remained one of the country’s most outspoken public intellectuals until his death.

Author James Traub voiced this opinion in his  1993 piece on the professor:

That’s Derek Bell’s bottom line: if it comforts whites, it’s bad; if it comforts blacks–i.e., Farrakhan–it’s good. Bell, along with Farrakhan and so many others, offers victimization as a consolation.

Bell, Pollak said, “was the Jeremiah Wright of academia and would have been proud to say he was the Jeremiah Wright of academia, because the ties between Jeremiah Wright and Derrick Bell are very, very close indeed.”

“Derrick Bell was the originator of a school of thought called critical race theory, and he said that the civil rights laws were bad for black people because it encouraged black people to believe that there could be racial equality. In his view, the entire system, the entire United States of America was white supremacist to its core and therefore you have to bring the entire system down. This is what he taught, this is what he wrote, and these are the ideas that Obama says on tape are inspiring him and causing everyone to open their eyes,” Pollak said.

Just because he protested in support of him doesn’t mean he shared his views. That makes as much sense as saying you went to the church led by a man you called your “spiritual mentor,” but you never heard his sermons in 20 years of attendance.

Hypocrisy abounds on the left:

Here’s the rub. The right deals in facts and logic. The left deals in emotion and hyperbole.

Because of that, the left generally wins the public debate, because facts and logic don’t translate into soundbyte portions well. And America is a soundbyte nation now.

I know, articulate is racist. But I thought President Obama was some sort of public speaking Jedi. In Toastmasters, you have a “Grunt Tabulator.” This is the person who keeps track of how many times you stop during your speech and say, “Uh…” They also keep track of double clutches. That’s where you start a sentence, pause, and then start it again.

Obama’s Grunt Tabulator would have pulled their hair out keeping track of everything during this video.

But Bush was a stumbling fool.

Hat Tip: JammieWearingFool via Weasel Zippers

This movie looks awesome. May 4th can’t get here fast enough:

If Newt doesn’t win the nomination, he needs to be in a position to speak for the Republican party. He’s not afraid of breitbarting anyone:

But what Rush said was bad:

“Their God … keeps smashing them into little grease spots on the pavement in Alabama, and Mississippi, and Arkansas, and Georgia, and Oklahoma. You know, the Bible belt, where they ain’t gonna let no goddamned science get in the way, it says in the Bible, blah blah blah blah. So, according to their way of thinking, God with his omnipotent thumb reaches down here and so far tonight has smashed about twenty people into a grease spot on highway 12, or whatever the hell highway they live next to.”

That, my friends, is hate and bigotry on full display.

I’d just like to note that following Rush’s rant on Sandra Fluke, the Radical in Chief called her to make sure she was all right.

He’s not called anyone who lost someone in the tornadoes.

Hat Tip: The Radio Equalizer via Weasel Zippers