Lindsey Graham v. Liz Cheney – I’ll Be In Cheney’s Corner

Sen. Lindsey Graham is a guy I would like to see retire. If he won’t retire, I think it is the solemn obligation of South Carolina voters to retire him.

Now, he’s got a problem with this ad from Keep American Safe:




Graham is actually defending not only the appointment of lawyers who defended al-Qaeda terrorists to the Justice Department, but the fact Holder won’t name them. And at the same time, he’s condemning Liz Cheney.

He had this to say:

“A defense attorney who is making the government do their job regardless of the nature of the case is making this whole country a better place,” said Graham, a military lawyer who’s currently a senior instructor at the Air Force JAG School. “I represented people as a defense attorney in the military that were charged with some pretty horrific acts and I gave them my all.”

I agree with the first part. Here’s a little bit of nuance for you, Lindsey. You don’t have to appoint those same people to the Justice Department. It’s not a law. You can say, “Oh, you defended people who wanted to kill thousands of innocent Americans while simultaneously destroying Western culture and installing an Islamic caliphate? I think I’ll pass.”

As for representing people “charged with some pretty horrific acts,” were you not appointed their defense lawyer? Weren’t these people who couldn’t afford a private sector lawyer? They have the choice.

As do the people who appointed lawyers who choose to defend the enemy. You don’t put people like that in the Justice Department.

Switzerland and The Brave New World

I just finished reading Aldus Huxley’s “Brave New World.” (I’ll change the graphic in the sidebar today, so you’ll be up to speed with my reading.) One of the disturbing aspects of the world Huxley creates is the sexual behavior of the children.

You read that right.

From early childhood, the people in Huxley’s world are encouraged to engage in sex. Here’s an excerpt from Chapter Three:

OUTSIDE, in the garden, it was playtime. Naked in the warm June sunshine, six or seven hundred little boys and girls were running with shrill yells over the lawns, or playing ball games, or squatting silently in twos and threes among the flowering shrubs. The roses were in bloom, two nightingales soliloquized in the boskage, a cuckoo was just going out of tune among the lime trees. The air was drowsy with the murmur of bees and helicopters.

…”That’s a charming little group,” he said, pointing.

In a little grassy bay between tall clumps of Mediterranean heather, two children, a little boy of about seven and a little girl who might have been a year older, were playing, very gravely and with all the focussed attention of scientists intent on a labour of discovery, a rudimentary sexual game.

“Charming, charming!” the D.H.C. repeated sentimentally.

“Charming,” the boys politely agreed. But their smile was rather patronizing. They had put aside similar childish amusements too recently to be able to watch them now without a touch of contempt. Charming? but it was just a pair of kids fooling about; that was all. Just kids.

“I always think,” the Director was continuing in the same rather maudlin tone, when he was interrupted by a loud boo-hooing.

From a neighbouring shrubbery emerged a nurse, leading by the hand a small boy, who howled as he went. An anxious-looking little girl trotted at her heels.

“What’s the matter?” asked the Director.

The nurse shrugged her shoulders. “Nothing much,” she answered. “It’s just that this little boy seems rather reluctant to join in the ordinary erotic play. I’d noticed it once or twice before. And now again to-day. He started yelling just now …”

“Honestly,” put in the anxious-looking little girl, “I didn’t mean to hurt him or anything. Honestly.”

“Of course you didn’t, dear,” said the nurse reassuringly. “And so,” she went on, turning back to the Director, “I’m taking him in to see the Assistant Superintendent of Psychology. Just to see if anything’s at all abnormal.”

“Quite right,” said the Director. “Take him in. You stay here, little girl,” he added, as the nurse moved away with her still howling charge. “What’s your name?”

“Polly Trotsky.”

“And a very good name too,” said the Director. “Run away now and see if you can find some other little boy to play with.”

The child scampered off into the bushes and was lost to sight.

Why in the world would Huxley write about children being encouraged to have sex? Here’s one opinion:

The interplay between sexuality and emotions is complex. Huxley realized that monogamy, sex, and family ties generate most human emotions. Thus, the Utopian society is based on promiscuity and baby factories. The goal is to eradicate emotions by replacing them with pure sexual desire and nothing else. This, combined with the baby factories, destroys family life and monogamous relationships. Emotions are therefore directed mostly by the state, which is necessary for social control and stability. It is interesting to note that the exact opposite technique was used by George Orwell in 1984. Orwell banned sexual relationships in order to eliminate dangerous emotions that might go against the state.

However, since both authors realized that sexual emotions destabilize society, each technique achivies the identical goal: elimination of sexual emotions.

It’s interesting, especially when you finish reading a book like “Brave New World” and find something like this at The Other McCain:

Extra small condoms for boys as young as 12 could soon be on our shelves.

The Hotshot condoms are going on sale in Switzerland after research found that not enough 12 to 14-year-old boys were having protected sex.

Yes, that does say “not enough 12 to 14-year-old boys were having protected sex.” But socialist Switzerland isn’t the only country with this problem. It seems the late Great Britain needs extra small condoms also:

A spokesman said the UK would be ‘top priority’ if the company expanded abroad, considering it had the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe.

Nysse Norballe said: ‘At the moment we are only producing the Hotshot in Switzerland.

‘But the UK is certainly a very attractive market since there is a very high rate of underage conception.’

I’m not saying that Switzerland and the late Great Britain are using Huxley’s book as a how-to guide. That would be ridiculous considering how well they are already using “1984.” I just think it’s interesting that our values have broken down so much that there is actually a market for pre-teen rubbers.

Did I say “interesting?” I meant “sad.” Perhaps if parents were a little less focused on other things, they could focus on their children and educate them about morals and sex. Instead they are being trained by society that sex is just fun and with the right equipment, totally safe.

It’s almost like they are working towards the “elimination of sexual emotions.”

Middle School Girls Says No to Drugs, Gets Suspended for Five Days

Ever have someone hand you something that you then realized you didn’t want?

That’s what happened to Rachel Greer, a seventh grade student in Jefferson, Indiana. She was in the locker room when another female student brought in a bag of Adderall:

Rachael Greer said it happened on Feb. 23 during fifth period gym class at River Valley Middle School when a girl walked into the locker room with a bag of pills.

“She was talking to another girl and me about them and she put one in my hand and I was like, ‘I don’t want this,’ so I put it back in the bag and I went to gym class,” said Rachael.

Believe it or not, kids do say no to drugs.

However, that really doesn’t matter to Greater Clark County Schools. She touched the pill. She’s guilty as sin, even though she didn’t actually “sin.”

During the next period, an assistant principal came and took Rachael out of class. It turned out the girl who originally had the pills and a few other students got caught. That’s when the assistant principal gave Rachael a decision.

“We’re suspending you for five days because it was in your hand,” said Rachael.

Think that is bad, consider this. If Rachel had given the pill back, walked out of the gym and told the gym teacher about what happened, the same punishment would have been given to Rachel.

Now, what would motivate her to tell anyone about drugs on school property? In the future, how many kids will be thrown under the bus when a pusher gets pinched? Seems like it would be pretty easy to finger a kid who you think might have told on you. Just tell the teacher they touched it and they get a nice drug related addition to their permanent record.

The only thing Rachel did wrong was not turning in the girl who had the drugs, but then again, it wouldn’t have mattered. She’d still be suspended and her scholastic future made that much more difficult because of regulations that prevent common sense and judgement from school officials.

1,776 Facebook Friends – Cool

Noticed this when I was listing the top 9 most successful fast food chains (yeah, that’s what you miss if you aren’t my Facebook friend.)

1776 friends. All patriots.

Kinda cool.

201003072018.jpg

My First Pajamas Media Article: Homeschooling vs. Howard Zinn

I have officially accomplished one of my 2010 blogging goals. If you remember, I set the following goal back in January:

Goal #7: Become a Paid Columnist Again

Getting writing gigs is tough these days. In order for me to get another paid column, I am going to have to perform here first. By focusing on quality articles here, hopefully it will lead to getting paid for quality articles somewhere else.

Well, today I was published at Pajamas Media. Here’s a taste:

While the untrained homeschool dad is teaching his children about American history from two authors who focus on facts, the trained teacher is busy educating students about how terrible America has been from its creation, because the author of their text “wanted to be a part of history.”

But then again, the students in the all important “brick and mortar” school may not even be burdened with learning history. North Carolina state education leaders recently floated the idea of starting high school level American history at 1877, foregoing all that unnecessary learning about the Revolutionary War or even the Civil War.

Why would this even be considered?

Rebecca Garland, chief academic officer for the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, says they are trying to “figure out a way to teach [history] where students are connected to it, where they see the big idea, where they are able to make connections and draw relationships between parts of our history and the present day.”

The Foundry, the Heritage Foundation’s blog, explained what that means:

By implication, nothing before 1877 has any meaning to students …

Early 20th century Progressives also taught that nothing before 1877 has meaning for today. In his new book We Still Hold These Truths: Rediscovering our Principles, Reclaiming Our Future, Matthew Spaulding recounts Progressives attack on America’s First Principles. The Progressives sought to remake America, so that the Declaration’s Founding Principles, the Constitution’s institutional structures, and the Civil War’s meaning as a victory for Founding principles would no longer ring true. The progressives argued that equal, natural rights were non-existent; government creates rights.

Between the leftist slant in the texts and the outright banishment of a century of American history, it is difficult to see how having the endorsement of the state government automatically results in a better education.

Let me know what you think.

Weekend Link Love: Aerosmith Edition




Homeschool Buzz: Should Australia Follow the German Homeschool Ban? (Answer: No.)

Weasel Zippers: The Nightmare of Socialized Medicine: Secret Plans Reveal Hundreds of British NHS Hospital Wards to Be Shut Down

Blackfive: Paratrooper Hand Shake (Very cool.)

Flopping Aces: CBO – OBama Budget Deficit $1.2 Trillion more Than Expected

Gina Cobb: Liberal Economist Paul Krugman Unwittingly Comes Full Circle; Scoffs at His Own Economic Theory




The Jawa Report: Oops, Should have Done a Thorough Background Check on OUr Muslim Chaplain Seikh Mustapha

Jihad Watch: White House – Hey, Let’s Try The 9/11 Jihadis in Military Tribunals.

ARRA News Service: Americans Are More Dependent on the Government

Gateway Pundit: Unreal. School Board President of Failing Detroit Schools Can’t Write

Barking Moonbat Early Warning System: Damn that Al Gore – “Worst Freeze in 15 Years” Ices Ships into the Baltic; Over 1000 Stranded




Wizbang: Patient Destroys Doctor’s Anti-Obamacare Posters

Don Surber: Today’s Global Warming Surrender

Scared Monkeys: Nevada Senate Election 2010 – Harry Reid Sinking Fast, Trails GOP’s Lowden, Tarkanian & Angle By Wider Margins

Doug Ross: Change – WaPo Admits Obama Will Add $9.7 Trillion to U.S. Debt by 2020

Hot Air: You Know What America Needs Now? A brutal Battle Over Amnesty




Ace of Spades: LAT Headline – “Obama Encouraged by Steady Unemployment Rate”

Political Pistachio: Local Elections Influenced by Tea Party Wildfires

The Sundries Shack: Crazy is Crazy, No Matter What Lever You Pull

small dead animals: Climategate – Blame Sweden

Moonbattery: Caution – The Weak Should Not Watch This Video




Weasel Zippers: Must See – Glenn Beck Does Entire Show on the Indoctrination/Brainwashing of our Children

Holy Coast: Karl Rove – How Bush Chose Cheney

GayPatriot: Hey, Mr. President, Isn’t It Time For a New Economic Team?

Pirate’s Cove: British Military Here Shot Between Eyes, Continues Flying Helicopter

Red State: Bob Bennett Must Go – His Campaign Staff is On RedState Attacking Conservatives




If Bush Was Responsible for the Oil Prices Then, Who’s Responsible for Them Now?

Remember these great hits from the last administration’s critics?

First up, Dividend Money had what was pretty standard fair in the leftosphere:

Do you think that it is important to look at possible ulterior motives of government administrators when casting your vote?

Check out the following graph to see what President Bush accomplished during his term in the White House. (Remember, Bush is an “oil man”)

Bush Drives Up Oil Prices

Then, I give you Jack Cafferty:

CAFFERTY: I don’t know. Oil was $28 a barrel when George Bush was sworn in. It’s $104 right now and could go to $120 soon. Now, why do you suppose that is? It wouldn’t have to do with the policies of the Bush administration or the relationship they have with the oil companies, would it? Come on.

Katie Couric, discussing the drop in oil prices prior to the 2006 election, asked:

“Is this an election year present from President Bush to fellow Republicans?” Over a shot of a “GOP: Grand Oil Party” bumper sticker laying on a dashboard, reporter Anthony Mason asserted: “Gas started going down just as the fall campaign started heating up. Coincidence? Some drivers don’t think so.”

Nancy Pelosi said it was Bush’s fault too:

Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, stated, “drivers are paying a heavy price for the Bush administration’s failure to enact a comprehensive energy strategy. Years of Bush administration policies that have favored Big Oil over the consumers have resulted in record dependence on foreign oil.”

USA Today had this headline:

Democrats blame Bush for high gas prices

The left’s subtle conspiracy theories had an effect.

A hefty 42% of Americans polled over the weekend said they think fuel prices are being manipulated by the Bush administration to help Republicans in an election year. The USA TODAY/Gallup Poll has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

Which brings me to my point. If “BushCo” was responsible then, who is responsible for this:

Oil prices rose to near $81 a barrel Friday in Asia as crude traders followed equity markets higher ahead of a key U.S. jobs report.

Benchmark crude for April delivery was up 48 cents to $80.69 a barrel at late afternoon Singapore time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell 66 cents to settle at $80.21 on Thursday.

Three days after Obama took office, the price of crude oil was $46.47. It has nearly doubled. Not quite, but it’s getting there. Since he has been in office, he has had a Democrat Congress more than willing to give him whatever he wanted.

So why are oil prices rising again? At least during the Bush years, oil prices dropped in the winter months because of demand. This winter oil prices just kept climbing.

Is Obama in league with Big Oil? Or are there actually other factors that weigh in on the price of oil?

Like, say, demand.

Mark Levin Live at the Reagan Library

Mark Levin is speaking at the Reagan Library tonight. You can watch the speech live here.

I plan on live Tweeting it.

Iran Building “Massive Launch Site”, Clearly Obama’s Foreign Policy is Working

According to Israel Radio, Iran is building a huge launch site with help from North Korea. It seems the threat of negotiations is having little to no affect on the modern day Hitler, aka Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Instead, he seems fearless:

The new launcher, constructed near an existing rocket base in the Semnan province east of Teheran, is visible in satellite imagery, according to the report.

The defense intelligence group said the appearance of the launcher suggests assistance from North Korea, also that it may be intended to launch the Simorgh, a long-range missile unveiled in early February and officially intended to be used as a space-launch vehicle (SLV).

After analyzing images of the missile, Inbar said that it appeared to currently be powered by liquid fuel, but could one day be configured to work with a solid fuel propellant, a technology that the Iranians have already begun using in their Sajil ballistic missile, which has a range of around 2,500 km.

‘This is a major technological breakthrough and could mean that the Iranians are on their way to obtaining an ICBM,’ he said.

Israel and other Western countries suspect that Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful.

President Shimon Peres likened nuclear weapons in the hands of madmen like Ahmadinejad to “flying death camps.” That’s accurate.

History has shown what happens when countries ignore the obvious. I don’t think Israel will allow Iran an ICBM. The question is where Obama will stand.

Rep. Massa (D-NY) To Resign

Via a tweet from Ali Akbar, I found this news flash. New York is losing a Congressman. Rep. Eric Massa is reportedly resigning Monday.

Why?

Earlier this week, the House ethics committee confirmed it was looking in to allegations against Massa. Those allegations reportedly include sexual harassment of a member of the Congressman’s staff.

The Congressman said that isn’t the case:

“There are blogs who are saying I’m leaving because there are charges of harassment against my staff,” the New York Democrat said on the call. “Do I or have I ever used salty language? Yes I have and I have apologized to those where it is appropriate.

“But those kinds of articles — unsubstantiated and without fact and backing — are a symptom of what is wrong in this city,” he added, a likely reference to the Politico story, which quoted anonymous sources discussing charges of harassment.

He also said he wasn’t seeking re-election because of a third bout with cancer and doctor’s order to take it easy.

Mmm-hmmm. And Larry Craig just has a wide stance.


Video & Audio Comments are proudly powered by Riffly