Taking Heat for High Gas Prices, Obama Proposes Further Government Meddling in Market

Never one to step forward and accept responsibility for the mess he’s made, President Barack Obama today suggested that in order to reduce the cost of oil, the federal government would have to go in and keep the speculators from, well, speculating:

Fighting to contain voter anger over sky-high gas prices, President Barack Obama urged Congress to toughen penalties for improper manipulation of oil markets and called for stricter government oversight of energy markets.

“None of these steps by themselves will bring gas prices down overnight,” the president said in the White House Rose Garden. “But it will prevent market manipulation and make sure we’re looking out for American consumers.”

You know what will keep speculators from making wild speculations? Huge losses.

What the country and the economy needs is less government in the free market, not more. There are several things the president could do right now that would impact the price of oil. He could open areas currently off limits to oil exploration. He could instruct his Secretary of Interior to lift the permatorium put in place to slow the production of oil on federal land.

He could just make an announcement that America intends to explore our natural resources and become a dominate player in the world oil market.

All those things would motivate speculators to start dropping the expected price of oil in the future. Why?

Because they would expect an increase in the supply, thus lowering the price.

But that’s not what this president is interested in. Remember, this is the guy who didn’t mind the increase in gas prices, but was irritated they happened to rapidly.

No, he wants to paint the oil companies, large and small, as evil and capitalism as the problem.

Sounds like another guy I’ve read about.

Respond to this: 1 Comment

TSA Patdown Leaves Passenger in Tears; Behold, Liberty

New video from the nation’s airports showing a woman who was trying to get from Point A to Point B. In between, the federal government:

Here’s the sad fact. If tomorrow, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood joined Big Sis Janet Napolitano in announcing the dissolution of the Transportation Security Administration and airports across the United States were responsible for their own security, there would be much rejoicing.

However, what you wouldn’t see announced, but would be implemented, would be a system of regulations that required private security at airports to essentially be the same as the TSA.

They would not simply allow every airport to decide its own policy.

Personally, if the free market were allowed to dictate, I would choose to fly on the airline that handed out Tasers when they checked your boarding passes. Or Sig Sauers with rubber bullets.

An armed airplane is a polite airplane.

Respond to this: 3 Comments

Georgia Mandates Drug Screening for Welfare Recipients

Republicans in Georgia passed a law that requires people receiving welfare benefits in the state to submit to a drug screening.

The new drug-testing law requires parents who apply for the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program to pay for and pass a drug test that would cost at least $17. TANF provides temporary financial help to low-income families with children. Passing the drug test once would be a condition of eligibility to receive benefits.

Detractors, aka Democrats, are clamoring the drug test is a clear violation of the looters 4th Amendment rights. For those who need reminding, the 4th Amendment says:

Critics says that forcing people to submit their urine for a test is equal to an unConstitutional search of their body. However, these same people have no problem with the same force, government, mandating people surrender their property to it can be given to “the needy.”

However, no one is forcing Georgia residents to accept public aid, therefore, no entity, government or otherwise, is forcing said residents to submit to a search. By freely accepting the property of their neighbors, they freely choose to have their urine tested.

If anything, this doesn’t go far enough. But few are willing to go as far as I’d prefer.

Ironically, they have little to say about public sector employees in Georgia having to submit to drug testing to receive a paycheck.

Respond to this: 4 Comments

Obama Says Using Force to Take From the Rich for Government Programs Not “Redistribution”

President Obama is in Colombia, scouting locations for the First Lady’s next vacation spot (no, really) and was asked a question about the redistributionist nature of his policies.

He replied that the use of government, aka “force,” to take the property of wealthy Americans and launder it through multiple levels of bureaucracy to that it can be given to looters nationwide isn’t “redistribution.”

Only he said it like this:

“That is not an argument about redistribution. That is an argument about growth,” Obama said in response to a reporter’s question at a news conference in Colombia. “In the history of the United States, we grow best when our growth is broad based.”

One of the themes of the Summit of the Americas meeting Obama attended here over the weekend was tackling poverty and inequality. That dovetails with aspects of Obama’s domestic message about unfairness in the tax code, but, as POLITICO noted here before the trip, it also left an opening for critics to paint him as emulating some in the Latin American left.

No kidding? Who would have considered comparing him to Chavez or Daniel Ortega?

Perhaps he meant to say it isn’t “just” about redistribution. It’s also about division of the classes in order to make the progressive, as in slow and methodical, shift from capitalism and liberty to socialism more possible.

It certainly isn’t about reducing the deficit.

Respond to this: 4 Comments

New Clip from The Avengers

A new clip from the movie I’ve been waiting my whole life for, The Avengers, has been released: It features a war of words between Nick Fury, played by Samuel Jackson, and Loki, played by Tom Hiddleston:

<a href="http://movies.uk.msn.com/exclusives/video.aspx?videoid=c6e87d84-7e48-4632-a897-58e4aa7b5044&#038;src=FLPl:embed::uuids" onclick="javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackEvent','outbound-article','http://movies.uk.msn.com']);" target='_new' title='Marvel Avengers Assemble Exclusive Clip - Loki Imprisoned' >Video: Marvel Avengers Assemble Exclusive Clip &#8211; Loki Imprisoned</a>

Love how Black Widow looks at Bruce Banner when it’s revealed Loki’s prison was built for the Hulk. Sort of like, “Heh. Yeah…”

Respond to this: Comments Off

Geithner Says Overall, Energy Prices Are Down, So Stop Complaining About Gas Prices (Video)

I heat my house with a wood burning stove. I like wood heat, but we have the stove because I was constantly having to repair our furnace after it quit working at 2 am.

It was propane. (Cue Hank Hill reference here.)

I also have a 42 mile commute. One way. I drive a 1998 Chevrolet Malibu. The cost of this commute under Obama has nearly crippled our budget. If it weren’t for the high cost of gasoline, and the rises in the costs of everything else because of it, I would be able to save a lot more of my paycheck.

Instead, filling my 12 gallon gas tank drains $40 each time I fill up.

But I’m supposed to take heart. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner says that overall, energy prices have gone down because natural gas is so cheap:

Out of touch, much?

What about people who don’t use natural gas, like me? My energy prices have only increased.

What about, as I mentioned above, the increase in the price of shipping, which trickles down to an increase in the prices of goods?

What about the fact that utility rates in America have skyrocketed since Obama took office, as he promised he would do?

It means overall, Americans are suffering because of the high price of gasoline. And before you start in with the idea that Obama is responsible for an increase in oil production in American, just don’t.

At best, Geithner is cold and utilitarian in his thinking. At worst, he is a cold blooded liar for Obama.

What say you?

Respond to this: 2 Comments

Obama Advisor Blames Republican Congress for Problems, WSJ Reminds Her About 2008-2010

It is clear the Obama administration is going to try to make the foundation of his campaign that repressive Republicans in Congress are the reason everything is swirling the drain in America, especially for women. That narrative was being set forth on ABC’s This Week yesterday.

The Wall Street Journal’s Paul Gigot, after hearing about how Republicans are blocking all of Obama’s best efforts, reminded the panel that Democrats did whatever they wanted for two full years, and it’s not working for anyone:

PAUL GIGOT, EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR WALL STREET JOURNAL: We’ve had the largest expansion of federal government spending since the nineteen, I mean, enormous that I can remember in this administration. The first two years it had open field, Democratic, vast Democratic majorities. You got what you wanted. You got a huge expansion of federal government. How is that working out for the economic security of women?

VANDEN HEUVEL: But, Paul…

GIGOT: It hasn’t. Real incomes are down.

Facts are stubborn things, which is what liberals and Democrats rely on emotions and imagery.

But Gigot’s right. Anything the President wanted between 2008 and when Speaker John Boehner first cried while holding the gavel, he got. Now, we are supposed to believe that the reason the Stimulus Bill is a big crap sandwich is because Rep. Paul Ryan and his friends are holding everything up.

And the sad fact is, people will buy that line.

Respond to this: Comments Off

Weekend Link Love: The J Geils Band Edition

Ace of Spades: North Carolina Democratic Party Official Charged With Sexually Harassing a Dude; Victim Paid Off

Doug Ross: Hilarious: 1,800-word article on John Edwards trial doesn’t mention the word ‘Democrat’, but manages to mention ‘Republican’ 5 times

Powerline: WHAT DOES THE PROSECUTOR HAVE ON GEORGE ZIMMERMAN?

American Glob: Glenn Reynolds Debunks Harvard Professor On Constitutionality of ObamaCare

Moonbattery: New Black Panthers Call for Black Army in Florida

Gulag Bound: Interview with Deneen Borelli – Author of Blacklash

The Right Scoop: Obama doesn’t pay his fair share even though he said you should

Weasel Zippers: Farrakhan Tells Blacks: Breeding With Whites Is “End of Your Race”…

American Pundit: Obama Follows Erotic Website on Twitter

Hot Air: Gallup: Americans heavily favor the Buffett Rule, 60/37

Doug Ross: Death Panels: They’re Real, and They’re SPECTACULAR

iOwntheWorld: Buffet Rule

Gateway Pundit: Newt: UN Should Adopt Treaty Giving Everyone on Earth Gun Rights

Hot Air: Barack Obama is a Chevy Volt, or possibly a Yugo

Newsbusters: Live Report From North Korea Cut Short After NBC Reporter Describes Failed Missile as ‘Enormous Embarrassment’

Weasel Zippers: DNC Chief Wasserman Schultz: Hilary Rosen Has Never Worked For DNC During My Tenure — Reality: DNC Paid Rosen $120K Since 2011 As a “Media Consultant”…

Moonbattery: Dershowitz: Zimmerman Arrest Affidavit Is “Irresponsible and Unethical”

The Right Scoop: Biden: GOP has a social policy on contraception that takes us “back to the ‘50’s”

Jihad Watch: Nigerian Muslims misunderstand Islam, vow: “We are proud soldiers of Allah; we will never give up as we fight the infidels”

Althouse: “The prosecutor has most likely deliberately overcharged, hoping to intimidate Zimmerman into agreeing to a plea bargain.”

Respond to this: 2 Comments

This is What Passes for “Moderate” to Maine Democrats

The  Democrat chair of the Maine legislature’s Moderate Caucus, Rep. Chuck Kruger, took to Twitter to display what a moderate looks like to a Democrat.  He called for Vice President Dick Cheney to be executed, and he wants it recorded.

New tone:

Kruger made the statement through his Twitter account this past summer, saying, “Cheney deserves same final end he gave Saddam. Hope there are cell cams,” a reference to technology that would allow Kruger to watch the proposed execution of the former Vice President of the United States.

A tip alerted The Maine Wire to the extreme comment just days after Kruger led a meeting of the Moderate Caucus that featured a visit from Eliot Cutler, a former Democrat and failed candidate for Governor in the fall of 2010.

The keynote speaker, Cutler talked about finding middle ground to work from. “I think we’re going to see a shift that draws the two parties back to the middle,” Cutler said in a Bangor Daily News article. “I think we’re going to see the return to civility and to moderation,” Cutler said in another interview with public radio.

Bat One at Say Anything Blog advised Kruger not to try to pass himself off as a moderate. Personally, I wonder if he doesn’t think he’s a moderate. After all, when you read some of the things the base is saying about Ann Romney, who’s really done nothing to anyone, calling for the execution of Darth Vader isn’t really that over the top.

Respond to this: 1 Comment

TED Talk Shows Private Schools Work, Even For the Very Poor; Meanwhile, Obama Crushes DC Voucher Program

I was pointed to this TED talk tonight, by Cato@Liberty.

In the video, Dr. Pauline Dixon shows what she found when she studied education in some of the most poverty stricken areas of the world.  Andrew Coulson writes:

Private schools … that charge fees … that are paid for by the poor parents themselves … and that outperform local government schools spending far more per pupil. I know. You’ll just have to watch it.

Unrecognized private schools are educating children better than the government.

Meanwhile, in America, President Obama is crushing a program in Washington, DC that gave vouchers to parents so they could choose to send their children to private schools. Schools like the President sends his kids to.

“Budgets are about choices,” stated President Obama in recent remarks to governors about his massive fiscal year (FY) 2013 budget request. Nothing more clearly demonstrates the Administration’s priorities than Obama’s decision to once again place the successful D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program (DCOSP) on the chopping block while simultaneously growing the Department of Education’s (DOE) budget more than any other federal agency.

 


In so doing, President Obama is showing low-income D.C. families that his priority is maintaining the unacceptable status quo—at least when it comes to other programs—while bowing to special interest groups like the education unions to eliminate the DCOSP. The Washington Post editorialized yesterday:

Surely, it shouldn’t be among the president’s priorities to single out for attack a tiny federal program that not only works—in the judgment of federal evaluators—but also enjoys bipartisan support. If it is, we trust that [House Speaker John] Boehner [R–OH] would step in, as he did last year, to save a program that D.C.’s poorest families value for their children.

Boehner did in fact save the voucher program last year. The Speaker leveraged last year’s heated budget negotiations to secure a five-year reauthorization of the DCOSP. And as the Post notes today, families “welcomed the certainty.” But once again, poor families in the nation’s capital, home to some of the lowest-performing and least safe public schools in the country, are left to wonder why President Obama has singled out this small, yet effective, school choice program.

Democrats are not interested in educating kids.  They are interested in indoctrinating kids.

And bending to the will of the teacher’s unions.

Hat Tip:  Doug Ross

Respond to this: Comments Off

49 Former NASA Scientists Hate Polar Bears, Reject AGW As “Settled Science”

Forty-nine former NASA scientists signed a letter sent to the agency, which was still busy telling Muslims how awesome they are at science and stuff, which requested NASA do one thing: look at the evidence for global warming and base decisions on it, rather than a political agenda. The data, they say, doesn’t lead one to the conclusion that CO2 is causing global warming.

Here’s the letter:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Blanquita Cullum 703-307-9510 bqview at mac.com

Joint letter to NASA Administrator blasts agency’s policy of ignoring empirical evidence

HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012.

49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.

The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.

H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS.

NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance

“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward. “There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”

Select excerpts from the letter:

“The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”

“We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”

“We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”

The full text of the letter:

March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)
CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science
CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center
Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change.
/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years
/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years
/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years
/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years
/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years
/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years
/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years
/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years
/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years
/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years
/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years
/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years
/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years
/s/ Anita Gale
/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years
/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years
/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years
/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years
/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years
/s/ Thomas J. Harmon
/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years
/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years
/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years
/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years
/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years
/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years
/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years
/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen
/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years
/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years
/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years
/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years
/s/ Tom Ohesorge
/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years
/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years
/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years
/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years
/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years
/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years
/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years
/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years
/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years
/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years
/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years
/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years

Respond to this: Comments Off

Joe Biden to Crying Baby: You’ll Have to Pay for Romney’s Tax Cuts

Joe Biden, resident super genius of the Obama Administration, was trying to sell some leftist nonsense today when a baby started wailing. Joe said, “I don’t blame her for crying. She is going to inherit it. She’s going to pay for it. That’s one smart baby.”

Real Clear Politics has the video.

Let me once again show you the t-shirt my then pregnant wife wore to our first Tea Party in Kansas City, Missouri:

That was all the way back in 2009.

Today, that unborn child, now two and quite awesome, owes $49,979.87.

You know what that means, Joe? It means because of your and President Obama’s spending, my son now owe an additional $13,000 and change.

Your deficit spending, more in three years than Bush had in eight, will have to be paid for someday.  That crying baby in the audience who you decided to use as a prop to further your agenda will have to pay back whatever loans we take to cover your socialist programs.  Plus interest.

Maybe that’s why she was crying.  Not because the government may decide to decrease the looting of the American taxpayer, but because you are already burying her in debt.

Respond to this: 1 Comment

US Debt Greater than All of the Eurozone’s Combined

When this came up on my Google Reader, all I could think was, “Good God…”

The Republican side of the Senate Budget Committee will release this chart later today, clearly showing that America’s debt is greater than the combined debt of the entire Eurozone and the U.K.:

As the chart shows, America’s debt is currently $15.1 trillion, while the Eurozone (which includes France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, the U.K., and others) has a combined debt of $12.7 trillion. (All dollar amounts are in U.S. dollars, and the data refers to closing 2011 numbers.)

The Eurozone is larger than the United States, so America’s debt per capita also exceeds the Eurozone’s. According to the Census Bureau, the U.S. has a population of 313 million, whereas the Eurozone has a population in excess of 331 million.

And the answer to the problem?  If you’re a liberal, it’s more spending.

If your a conservative, it’s less government, more free market.

Which are you?

Respond to this: 4 Comments